→ all explorations

CauseMatch: Pricing and Billing

A cap switches the percentage off, so the organisation that gets the most pays the smallest share of it. At the same time a single large invoice costs a nonprofit relationship that eight medium invoices from eight vendors would not have cost. Fixing the first makes the second worse, which is why neither has been fixed.

• v12026-08-12 The two axes, eleven options, one recommendationcurrentThe finding that reframes it: the published Campaign in a Box card already prices a three million dollar campaign at six figures, and rule four routes every large deal out of that card before anyone quotes it. So the cap is not in the rate card, it is in the negotiation. Then six ways to charge and five ways to bill, each with where it loses, a live model with the cap as a slider because the real figures are not mine to assume, a scored matrix against sales carrying capacity, and one sequenced recommendation with the four findings that would overturn it. CauseMatch open ←

Nothing matches that.

Sibling topics: the Client Service Operating Model, the Category Launch Plan, the Vendor Marketplace Models and the Coaching Journey Builder. This one is about what CauseMatch charges and how the bill arrives.