The Metaphysics of Nothingness and Being
המטפיזיקה של האַיִן
Prof. Oded Maimon spent a career teaching machines to find patterns in data. He has just finished a book asking who is doing the looking. An exploration in rounds: first an explainer built from his own two descriptions, then, with the full 532-page pre-print in hand, answers to the three questions he sent back.
⌕
- Three questions from the author, answered from the whole book The author read v2, recorded three questions before a flight, and sent the entire 532-page pre-print. Answers with the full text read: AI's one assumption vs the Ayin, whether an AI could invent the zero axis of soft logic, and whether the leaf really is the emptiness. The mathematics audited against its own appendices; the traditions mapped; verdicts argued. The Book Open →
- Could an AI have written this book? The full explainer, plus a real adversarial exercise: two AI agents argue opposite sides of whether an AI could have originated the book and written it end to end, the skeptic handed the advocate's case to attack. Verdict: yes to the artifact, no to the act, and why the difference is the whole question. The Book Open →
- The book, explained: one system, two names for nothing Why the questioner is the problem, why the author offers three different titles and why that slide is the most revealing thing about the project, where the book sits against Kant, Sartre, Advaita and the hard problem, the strongest objection, ten questions it puts to the reader, and nine chapters for the books after this one. The Book Open →
No version matches that search.
The manuscript has no public trace anywhere: not at his publisher, not at the Israeli booksellers, not in Hebrew or English search. It was finished days ago. Everything here about the book comes from what Oded sent, and says so.
The version pages ask for the topic password.